While this note has been "overcome" by the events of
Tuesday in St. Louis, I think it provides an accurate assessment of where we
ended up:
Friends:
This is a brief note to provide you an update on what has
transpired so far in St. Louis at the special, called United Methodist General
Conference on Human Sexuality.
The Special Session has until 5:30 PM our time today to wrap up,
but I think it is fairly safe to forecast that the current status quo will be
maintained. Multiple “plans” were discussed and considered but only the
Traditional Plan reached the floor of the General Conference as potentially
approved. The Traditional Plan would retain the current homosexuality as
“incompatible with a Christian life-style” wording and would attempt to make
enforcement of violations of the Discipline more uniform
across the connection. When we talk about the connection, we are
referring to all of us who call ourselves “United Methodists.” The
Traditional Plan, particularly the enforcement element, keeps running into
problems in how the United Methodist Church is organized, with Conferences
having wide latitude and authority constitutionally.
Progressives lack the voting power to bring about the desired
policy changes, and Traditionalists lack the voting power to bring about the
constitutional changes needed to accomplish enforcement across the
connection. The UMC Constitution, like the US Constitution, has a high
bar for change, and neither side has the votes to do it. About 2/3 of the
US Church is in favor of more inclusive language, but only represents about 60%
of total delegates. The final count on most issues keeps settling in at
the 55/45 percents with inclusive being the 45%. Differences exist here,
but that is about right.
My own assessment, unless something unexpected happens this
afternoon, is that where we were last Friday, is where we are going to be
tomorrow: very divided on the topic of human sexuality.
I have already had a person or three express reservations about
continuing in a denomination which espouses a position of homosexuality as
“incompatible with a Christian life-style.” I am mindful that others feel
that if the UMC were to move to what is labeled a “more inclusive view” would
cause others to consider leaving. As I said a few weeks ago, we are going
to lose people no matter what happens, and here “we” means “the church” not
necessarily “Hilltop.”
I humbly ask for all of the events of the Conference to be
digested and processed, with “where next” considered after the passions of this
week have subsided.
I propose that after the 10:30 AM service is over this Sunday,
we grab some coffee and return to the sanctuary and talk, listen, pray, and
confer. I would think some kind of “question/answer” format would work
best. I am disappointed with where we are, but not without hope. I
hope our talk and time together can be constructive and helpful.
In the words of the confession of the Korean Methodist
Church: “we are not alone, we live in God’s world.”
Selah, Pastor Dennis
No comments:
Post a Comment